Fact-Checking Policy
Last updated: June 2025
Our Commitment to Accuracy
Accuracy is non-negotiable at Crypto Radar. In a space where token prices swing wildly, protocols change overnight, and misinformation can cost readers real money, we hold ourselves to a rigorous standard of factual verification before any claim reaches publication.
Every claim we publish about a cryptocurrency, exchange, wallet, or DeFi protocol — its mechanics, fees, security model, tokenomics, and on-chain data — goes through a fact-checking process before publication. This page explains exactly how that works.
What We Fact-Check
- Prices & market data — Verified against reputable market aggregators and exchanges at the time of publication, with a timestamp
- Fees & protocol mechanics — Verified from official documentation, whitepapers, or hands-on use of the platform
- On-chain data — Cross-referenced against block explorers and multiple independent analytics sources
- Project & team background — Verified from official announcements, audited contracts, and credible press coverage
- Statistical claims — Traced back to primary sources; we do not repeat unverifiable statistics or unaudited TVL figures
- Regulatory & compliance claims — Reviewed against publicly available documentation and official guidance
Our Verification Process
Primary source first
Where possible, we go directly to the source: the project's official documentation, whitepaper, audited smart contracts, block explorer, or official channels. Secondary sources are used to corroborate, not as a primary reference.
Hands-on verification
Claims about how a wallet, exchange, or protocol works are tested in practice, not taken from marketing materials. If we describe a staking flow or a swap fee, we have walked through it ourselves.
Date-stamping
All facts are verified at a specific date. Rapidly changing information (token prices, gas fees, APYs, protocol versions) is flagged with a verification date.
Editorial review
A second editor reviews factual claims in all published reviews before they go live. News articles are also reviewed for factual accuracy.
How We Handle Corrections
We are human and we make mistakes. When we publish an error — factual, technical, or representational — we correct it promptly and transparently.
Our corrections policy:
- Corrections are made to the live article as quickly as possible once verified
- A clearly labeled correction note is added to the bottom of the article explaining what changed and why
- We do not silently delete incorrect content — it is replaced with accurate information and the change is noted
- For significant errors, we may publish a correction notice on our social channels
- The article's "Updated" timestamp is revised to reflect when the correction was made
Reporting an Error
If you believe something we've published is factually incorrect, please tell us. We take all correction requests seriously and investigate promptly.
To report an error:
- Use our contact form and select "Correction or Feedback"
- Email us at onboarding@resend.dev with the article URL and specific claim in question
- Include a source or reference for the correct information if possible
We aim to respond to all correction requests within one business day.
Limitations & Opinions
Our coverage contains both factual claims and editorial opinions. Assessments, verdicts, and any view on a token or protocol are opinions based on our research methodology — they are not objective facts, not price predictions, and not financial advice. Reasonable people may disagree with them.
We distinguish between factual errors (which we correct) and differences of opinion (which we welcome debating). If you disagree with our verdict, we encourage you to share your perspective.